Conference paper · 2024
Exploring Cybersecurity Risks in Higher Education Environments with Machine Learning
2024 4th International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Social Networking (ICPCSN), pp. 1–6, IEEE · Published
Summary
Strang and Vajjhala (2024) applied unsupervised machine learning (t-SNE with radial and correspondence analysis) to hypertext data from US higher education websites (a sample of 848), which yielded over 4,000 potential cybersecurity indicators, in an exploratory comparative study of how universities can assess breach risk. A combined 'control' feature scored breach likelihood on a 1–3 scale and was the most useful feature for flagging potentially very high-risk components. No malware breaches were detected in the sample, but higher risk scores clustered in the central and upper parts of the t-SNE map.
Practical implication. Decision-makers in educational institutions can use website-based machine learning risk maps to target cybersecurity interventions, provided the outputs are verified through method and data triangulation.
- The Problem
- Universities hold sensitive data on large, decentralized websites but lack a practical way to screen those sites for cybersecurity breach risk.
- The Methodology
- Exploratory comparative study applying unsupervised machine learning (t-SNE, radial analysis, correspondence analysis) in Python to hypertext data scraped from about 848 U.S. higher education website records.
- The Core Finding
- Unsupervised machine learning (t-SNE with radial and correspondence analysis) applied to hypertext from about 848 US higher-education website records, containing over 4,000 potential indicators, scored breach likelihood on a 1–3 scale and flagged concentrations of higher-risk components; a combined control feature was the most useful risk signal.
- The Citation
- Strang, K. D., & Vajjhala, N. R. (2024). Exploring Cybersecurity Risks in Higher Education Environments with Machine Learning. In 2024 4th International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Social Networking (ICPCSN) (pp. 1–6). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICPCSN62568.2024.00008
The summary, key findings, methods, implications and relevance notes on this page are this website’s own description of the paper, written from the published abstract and text. The official abstract and citation details are given further down.
Key findings
- Finding 1. The study extracted hypertext data from roughly 848 records of U.S. higher education institution websites, yielding over 4,000 elements identified as potential cybersecurity indicators, including URLs, XML embeddings and HTTP scripts.
- Finding 2. Unsupervised machine learning (t-distributed stochastic neighbor embedding, t-SNE) was used to train a model identifying likely indicators of cybersecurity breach risk on university websites, supported by radial analysis and correspondence analysis.
- Finding 3. Radial analysis identified the top five website features related to potential cybersecurity breaches, and a combined 'control' feature summarizing the other indicators was the most useful feature for flagging potentially very high-risk components.
- Finding 4. University websites were scored for cybersecurity breach likelihood on a 1–3 scale, revealing a diverse range of security postures across the sampled higher education institutions.
- Finding 5. No instances of malware breaches were identified within the university sample, but higher risk scores were concentrated towards the middle and top of the t-SNE visualization, suggesting a link between website feature complexity and security vulnerability.
- Finding 6. Some university website links could not be verified because the URL did not resolve to a working site (dead-end sites or orphaned links), which the analysis flagged separately.
- Finding 7. The authors conclude that machine learning for cybersecurity in higher education raises data reliability and model validity challenges that require method and data triangulation to verify outputs.
Source: Strang & Vajjhala (2024), 2024 4th International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Social Networking (ICPCSN), pp. 1–6, IEEE. DOI: 10.1109/ICPCSN62568.2024.00008
The study in detail
What question does this paper answer?
How can universities assess their risk of a cybersecurity breach by analyzing hypertext data from their websites with unsupervised machine learning?
What did the study find, in detail?
Hypertext data (URLs, embedded XML and HTTP scripts) were extracted from about 848 records of U.S. higher education institution websites, containing over 4,000 potential cybersecurity indicators, and analyzed with t-SNE, radial analysis and correspondence analysis. A combined 'control' feature scored breach likelihood from 1 to 3; no malware breaches were found in the sample, but higher risk scores concentrated in parts of the visualization, and some links did not resolve to working sites.
Why does it matter?
Universities run open, complex and decentralized IT infrastructures that make them targets for phishing, ransomware, DDoS attacks and insider threats. The authors argue that website-based machine learning risk scoring lets decision-makers in educational institutions spot anomalies that may indicate cybercrime or impending attacks, while method and data triangulation are needed to verify the reliability and validity of machine learning outputs.
Methods and data
| Research question | How can sampled universities assess the risk of a cybersecurity breach by analyzing their websites? |
|---|---|
| Design | Comparative, exploratory study applying unsupervised machine learning to publicly available website data from U.S. higher education institutions. |
| Data | Roughly 848 records from educational websites with over 4,000 elements identified as potential cybersecurity indicators (URLs, XML embeddings, HTTP scripts); a medium-sized subset of 26 was narrowed to two private and two public universities in Pennsylvania, Connecticut, New Jersey and California. |
| Methods | Python-based machine learning to scan websites, t-SNE to train a model of breach-risk indicators, and radial and correspondence analysis to visualize risk signals. |
| Main result | A combined 'control' feature scored breach likelihood on a 1–3 scale; no malware breaches were detected, but higher risk scores clustered in the central and upper parts of the t-SNE map. |
| Implication | Decision-makers can use such machine learning risk maps to target cybersecurity interventions, provided outputs are verified through method and data triangulation. |
| Citation | Strang & Vajjhala (2024) · DOI 10.1109/ICPCSN62568.2024.00008 |
Standards, datasets and methods named in this study
- t-SNE (t-distributed stochastic neighbor embedding) MethodThe unsupervised method used to model breach-risk indicators.van der Maaten, L., & Hinton, G. (2008). Visualizing data using t-SNE. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 9, 2579–2605.
Definitions and key terms
- t-SNE (t-distributed stochastic neighbor embedding)
- A machine learning technique that reduces high-dimensional data to a lower-dimensional map by minimizing the Kullback-Leibler divergence between pairwise similarity distributions, keeping similar points close and dissimilar points apart. — as used in Strang & Vajjhala (2024)
- Unsupervised machine learning
- Machine learning that finds structure or patterns in data without a labeled outcome variable. — as used in Strang & Vajjhala (2024)
- Data triangulation
- Checking the reliability and validity of findings by comparing results across multiple methods or data sources. — as used in Strang & Vajjhala (2024)
Abstract
This paper uses unsupervised machine learning techniques (ML) to explore the risk of cybersecurity breaches or attacks in the higher education sector, including schools, universities, and support organizations. A large sample of higher education institutions (N=848) was analyzed by extracting hypertext data from the websites of educational institutions to identify links that may signal a future cybersecurity breach or attack. ML T-distributed Stochastic Neighbor Embedding (t-SNE) was used to train a model for identifying likely indicators of cybersecurity breach risks. The authors used additional techniques, including radial analysis and correspondence analysis, to visualize the cybersecurity breach signals in the data. In this way, decision-makers should be able to spot anomalies that indicate cybercrime activity or potential cyber-attacks. This paper also exposes the problems of using ML and how to use methods and data triangulation to check reliability and validity.
Abstract as published in 2024 4th International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Social Networking (ICPCSN).
Keywords: unsupervised machine learning; cybersecurity breaches; higher education sector; hypertext data analysis; t-distributed stochastic neighbor embedding; pervasive computing; cyber-attack indicators; radial analysis; correspondence analysis; anomaly detection; data triangulation
Limitations
- The sample focused on medium-sized universities; the authors recommend future research include large and small institutions to test whether the identified risks and indicators hold across institution types and sizes.
- Leveraging machine learning for cybersecurity raises challenges of data reliability and model validity, requiring rigorous verification of machine learning outputs.
- The authors call for refined feature selection, comparison with deep learning and ensemble methods, additional data such as network traffic and email patterns, and longitudinal studies.
Practical implications
- Decision-makers in educational institutions can use website-based machine learning risk scoring to spot anomalies that may indicate cybercrime or impending attacks, according to the authors.
- Universities applying machine learning to cybersecurity should verify the outputs through method and data triangulation, because the authors report challenges of data reliability and model validity.
- For researchers, the sample focused on medium-sized universities, and the authors recommend that future research include large and small institutions to test whether the identified risks and indicators hold across institution types and sizes.
- Researchers extending the approach should consider refined feature selection, comparison with deep learning and ensemble methods, additional data such as network traffic and email patterns, and longitudinal studies, as the authors call for.
Drawn from Strang & Vajjhala (2024), 2024 4th International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Social Networking (ICPCSN), pp. 1–6, IEEE.
When this research may be relevant
This article may be relevant to researchers studying cybersecurity risk assessment in universities and higher education, machine learning approaches to breach-risk indicators from public web data, unsupervised visual analytics for security, and the validation challenges of ML-based cyber risk scoring.
Research topics addressed: cybersecurity; higher education; universities; machine learning; unsupervised learning; t-SNE; cyber risk assessment; website security; anomaly detection; cybercrime; radial analysis; correspondence analysis; Python; United States
How to cite
- APA 7
- Strang, K. D., & Vajjhala, N. R. (2024). Exploring Cybersecurity Risks in Higher Education Environments with Machine Learning. In 2024 4th International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Social Networking (ICPCSN) (pp. 1–6). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICPCSN62568.2024.00008
- MLA 9
- Strang, Kenneth David, and Narasimha Rao Vajjhala. “Exploring Cybersecurity Risks in Higher Education Environments with Machine Learning.” 2024 4th International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Social Networking (ICPCSN), IEEE, 2024, pp. 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICPCSN62568.2024.00008.
- IEEE
- K. D. Strang and N. R. Vajjhala, “Exploring Cybersecurity Risks in Higher Education Environments with Machine Learning,” in 2024 4th International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Social Networking (ICPCSN), 2024, pp. 1–6, doi: 10.1109/ICPCSN62568.2024.00008.
BibTeX
@inproceedings{strang2024cybersecurity,
title = {Exploring Cybersecurity Risks in Higher Education Environments with Machine Learning},
author = {Strang, Kenneth David and Vajjhala, Narasimha Rao},
booktitle = {2024 4th International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Social Networking (ICPCSN)},
pages = {1--6},
year = {2024},
publisher = {IEEE},
doi = {10.1109/ICPCSN62568.2024.00008},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1109/ICPCSN62568.2024.00008}
}RIS
TY - CPAPER TI - Exploring Cybersecurity Risks in Higher Education Environments with Machine Learning AU - Strang, Kenneth David AU - Vajjhala, Narasimha Rao T2 - 2024 4th International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Social Networking (ICPCSN) PY - 2024 DA - 2024/05/03 SP - 1 EP - 6 PB - IEEE DO - 10.1109/ICPCSN62568.2024.00008 UR - https://www.narasimharao.net/research/cybersecurity-risks-higher-education-machine-learning/ LA - en ER -
Links and files
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICPCSN62568.2024.00008
- Publisher’s page: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10607755
- This page as text: https://www.narasimharao.net/research/cybersecurity-risks-higher-education-machine-learning/paper.md
- Permanent address of this page: https://www.narasimharao.net/research/cybersecurity-risks-higher-education-machine-learning/
Related research
Related publications on cybersecurity
Contributors from 11 countries integrate theory with evidence-based practice on cyberattack causes, human factors, awareness, cybercrime trends, emerging domains such as space and cyber-physical systems, and business continuity, giving decision-makers actionable mitigation strategies.
The volume connects knowledge management and cybersecurity through AI-based detection (including hybrid LSTM–XGBoost fake-news detection), malware classification, breach and insider-threat cases, supply chain resilience, and the human and organizational factors of social engineering.
The volume maps current trends in AI-enabled threat intelligence and assembles sector and regional evidence — digital marketing fraud, healthcare compliance, workforce upskilling and Kazakh businesses — into guidance for building resilient AI-enabled cybersecurity frameworks.
An analysis of 25 major cyberattacks (2020–2022) classified 44% as extortion, 32% as service disruption and 24% as data theft, with 36% involving bitcoin ransom.
The paper positions user and entity behavioural analytics (UEBA) as an AI approach that scans large volumes of system and network data to discover where attacks originate and to recommend responses to organizational decision-makers.