Journal article · 2020
Urgently strategic insights to resolve the Nigerian food security crisis
Outlook on Agriculture, 49(1), pp. 77–85 · Published (online first )
Summary
Strang et al. (2020) used consensual qualitative research in a six-hour focus group of 16 extension workers, representing about 900 farmers in North-East Nigeria, to find localized, prioritized solutions to the food security crisis. Multiple correspondence analysis produced a significant two-dimension model (19% and 17% of inertia; r² = 0.05, p < 0.05) that ranked affordable seeds and fertilizer, modern farming training, market information, roads and transport, affordable credit and agricultural mentors as the most strategically urgent ideas. A larger sample is needed to represent the whole country.
Practical implication. Government policymakers should prioritize affordable seeds and fertilizer, training, market data, roads and transport, credit and mentoring for rural Nigerian farmers.
- The Problem
- Nigeria’s food security crisis needs localized, prioritized solutions, but policy rarely draws on the practical knowledge of the extension workers who mentor rural farmers.
- The Methodology
- Pragmatic inductive study using consensual qualitative research with embedded nominal brainstorming in a six-hour focus group of 16 extension workers, prioritised with multiple correspondence analysis in SPSS 25.
- The Core Finding
- A focus group of extension workers representing about 900 farmers produced a significant two-dimension model of solutions, ranking affordable seeds and fertilizer, modern farming training, market information, roads and transport, affordable credit and agricultural mentors as the most strategically urgent.
- The Citation
- Strang, K. D., Che, F., & Vajjhala, N. R. (2020). Urgently strategic insights to resolve the Nigerian food security crisis. Outlook on Agriculture, 49(1), 77–85. https://doi.org/10.1177/0030727019873012
The summary, key findings, methods, implications and relevance notes on this page are this website’s own description of the paper, written from the published abstract and text. The official abstract and citation details are given further down.
Key findings
- Finding 1. The study gathered insights from 16 agricultural extension workers from the Mubi South, Maiha and Mubi North local government areas of North-East Nigeria, together representing about 900 rural farmers, in one 6-hour focus group.
- Finding 2. Multiple correspondence analysis produced a significant, parsimonious two-dimension model of Nigerian food security crisis ideas, with the first dimension (constraint severity) accounting for 19% of the inertia and the second (productivity importance) another 17%, and an r² of 0.05 (p < 0.05).
- Finding 3. The most strategically urgent ideas for resolving the Nigerian food security crisis were farmers’ access to affordable seeds and fertilizer, knowledge of modern farming methods and training, access to market information, road and transport infrastructure, affordable credit or financing, and agricultural mentors.
- Finding 4. Extension workers reported that government agricultural inputs in Nigeria are often diverted by local politicians and middlemen, so farmers sometimes make do with fewer than 3 bags of fertilizer where they once used 10.
- Finding 5. Participants described middlemen holding a buying monopoly over rural Nigerian farmers’ produce, paying very low prices, manipulating weights and bag sizes, and mixing good and bad produce.
- Finding 6. Boko Haram insurgency, kidnapping risk and government bans on motorbikes in LGAs such as Mubi North and Mubi South have prevented both farmers and extension workers from travelling to markets and farms.
- Finding 7. Operational and resilience-building ideas included local processing and climate-controlled storage facilities, safe storage and training for agrochemicals, restored training from agricultural research centres, and government support for farmers’ cooperative unions.
Source: Strang et al. (2020), Outlook on Agriculture, 49(1), pp. 77–85. DOI: 10.1177/0030727019873012
The study in detail
What question does this paper answer?
What localized, data-driven and prioritized solutions, grounded in the knowledge of agriculture extension workers, could resolve the food security crisis facing rural farmers in Nigeria?
What did the study find, in detail?
A 6-hour focus group of 16 agriculture extension workers from three North-East Nigeria LGAs (representing about 900 farmers) produced ideas that multiple correspondence analysis organized into a significant two-dimension model (dimensions explaining 19% and 17% of inertia; r² = 0.05, p < 0.05). The most strategically urgent ideas were access to affordable seeds and fertilizer, modern farming knowledge and training, market information, road and transport infrastructure, affordable credit, and agricultural mentors.
Why does it matter?
The authors argue that food security solutions in Nigeria fail unless they are data-driven and customized by local experts to local sociocultural conditions. Their prioritized model is intended to generalize to rural farmers in Nigeria and to government policymakers in developing countries, pointing to fixes such as restoring input distribution, supporting extension workers and creating farmers’ cooperative unions.
This study is part of the evidence overview What is holding back Nigerian agriculture and farm technology adoption? Evidence from extension workers and farmer surveys
Methods and data
| Research question | Which localized, prioritized ideas could resolve the Nigerian food security crisis for rural farmers? |
|---|---|
| Design | Pragmatic inductive study using consensual qualitative research (CQR) with embedded nominal brainstorming in one 6-hour focus group |
| Sample | 16 agricultural extension workers from Mubi South, Maiha and Mubi North LGAs (Adamawa State, North-East Nigeria), representing about 900 farmers |
| Methods | Multiple correspondence analysis in SPSS version 25 at a 95% confidence level, with member checking and a grounded theory literature review |
| Main result | Two-dimension model (19% and 17% of inertia; r² = 0.05, p < 0.05) splitting 20 ideas into strategically urgent, urgent, building resilience and operational tactics quadrants |
| Implication | Prioritize affordable seeds and fertilizer, training, market data, roads and transport, credit and mentoring for rural Nigerian farmers |
| Citation | Strang et al. (2020) · DOI 10.1177/0030727019873012 |
Definitions and key terms
- Food security
- The condition in which people have reliable access to sufficient, safe and nutritious food; the paper notes food insecurity affects about 11% of the world’s population and up to 64% in some Nigerian states. — as used in Strang et al. (2020)
- Consensual qualitative research (CQR)
- A qualitative method used at the group level of analysis in which researchers interpret and reach consensus on data collected from participants (Hill et al., 2005). — as used in Strang et al. (2020)
- Multiple correspondence analysis
- A non-parametric multivariate exploratory technique that estimates and plots the relationships among more than two categorical factors so that related ideas appear close together. — as used in Strang et al. (2020)
Abstract
The food security crisis is a serious worldwide predicament in developing countries but it is a relatively larger problem in Nigeria. We argued there was no solution for the Nigerian food security crisis because researchers had not customized theoretical models with data-driven priorities grounded on local agriculture subject matter expert knowledge. We collected data from local agriculture extension workers who had specialized knowledge of the problems. We applied the consensual qualitative research method with embedded nominal brainstorming and multiple correspondence statistical techniques at the group level of analysis to develop a proposed solution. Our final model highlighted strategically urgent ideas to increase agriculture productivity and appease the most severe constraints in rural Nigeria. The results extended what was already published in the literature and should generalize to rural farmers in Nigeria as well as to government policymakers in developing countries around the world.
Abstract as published in Outlook on Agriculture.
Keywords: Food insecurity; agriculture extension research; consensual qualitative research; focus group; correspondence analysis; agricultural policy; agricultural economics
Limitations and open questions
- The method is inductive: the authors chose the keywords used to partition the four quadrants and label the ideas, which was subjective (mitigated by member checking).
- The sample of 16 agricultural extension workers was small, although it represented over 900 farmers from Adamawa State, Nigeria; a larger sample is needed to represent the whole country.
- Additional studies and multiple analytical methods are needed to validate and extend the findings in Nigeria and other developing countries.
Open questions
- Would restoring input dissemination through the extension system, extension-worker allowances and farmer cooperatives measurably raise productivity?
Open questions from the evidence overview Agriculture, food security and farm information systems.
Practical implications
- Government policymakers can treat access to affordable seeds and fertilizer, modern farming knowledge and training, market information, road and transport infrastructure, affordable credit and agricultural mentors as the most strategically urgent ideas.
- Researchers and policymakers should make food security solutions in Nigeria data-driven and customized by local experts to local sociocultural conditions; the authors argue that solutions otherwise fail.
- The authors’ prioritized model, intended to generalize to rural farmers in Nigeria and to government policymakers in developing countries, points to fixes such as restoring input distribution, supporting extension workers and creating farmers’ cooperative unions.
- Researchers applying multiple correspondence analysis to qualitative focus group output should note that the authors chose the keywords used to partition the four quadrants and label the ideas, which was subjective (mitigated by member checking).
Drawn from Strang et al. (2020), Outlook on Agriculture, 49(1), pp. 77–85.
When this research may be relevant
This article may be relevant to researchers seeking prioritised, practitioner-derived interventions for food security in Nigeria and West Africa — seeds and fertiliser access, training, market information, roads, credit and mentoring — and to methodological work applying multiple correspondence analysis to qualitative focus group output.
Research topics addressed: food security; Nigeria; rural farmers; agriculture extension workers; agricultural policy; agricultural productivity; consensual qualitative research; focus group; nominal brainstorming; multiple correspondence analysis; Adamawa State; developing countries; farm financing and credit; agricultural inputs
How to cite
- APA 7
- Strang, K. D., Che, F., & Vajjhala, N. R. (2020). Urgently strategic insights to resolve the Nigerian food security crisis. Outlook on Agriculture, 49(1), 77–85. https://doi.org/10.1177/0030727019873012
- MLA 9
- Strang, Kenneth David, et al. “Urgently strategic insights to resolve the Nigerian food security crisis.” Outlook on Agriculture, vol. 49, no. 1, 2020, pp. 77–85. https://doi.org/10.1177/0030727019873012.
- IEEE
- K. D. Strang, F. Che, and N. R. Vajjhala, “Urgently strategic insights to resolve the Nigerian food security crisis,” Outlook on Agriculture, vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 77–85, Mar. 2020, doi: 10.1177/0030727019873012.
BibTeX
@article{strang2020nigeria,
title = {Urgently strategic insights to resolve the Nigerian food security crisis},
author = {Strang, Kenneth David and Che, Ferdinand and Vajjhala, Narasimha Rao},
journal = {Outlook on Agriculture},
volume = {49},
number = {1},
pages = {77--85},
year = {2020},
publisher = {SAGE},
doi = {10.1177/0030727019873012},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1177/0030727019873012}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Urgently strategic insights to resolve the Nigerian food security crisis AU - Strang, Kenneth David AU - Che, Ferdinand AU - Vajjhala, Narasimha Rao JO - Outlook on Agriculture PY - 2020 DA - 2020/03 VL - 49 IS - 1 SP - 77 EP - 85 PB - SAGE SN - 0030-7270 DO - 10.1177/0030727019873012 UR - https://www.narasimharao.net/research/nigeria-food-security-crisis-agriculture-extension-strategies/ LA - en ER -
Links and files
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0030727019873012
- This page as text: https://www.narasimharao.net/research/nigeria-food-security-crisis-agriculture-extension-strategies/paper.md
- Permanent address of this page: https://www.narasimharao.net/research/nigeria-food-security-crisis-agriculture-extension-strategies/
Related work
Related work: the literature this study cites
The study draws on literature reporting that food insecurity affected over 90 million citizens in 2017–2018[1]. Earlier work linked credit shortages to lack of collateral, high interest rates, low financial literacy and complex banking procedures[2]. Earlier work also found that a stronger extension-worker presence was associated with higher farmer productivity[3]. The cited work warns that farmers view training positively but often find its content irrelevant[4], and that even well-intended regulation struggles to reach rural Nigerians[5]. Rural transport research is cited for farmers’ reliance on motorcycles and bicycles over 5–10 km a day[6].
- [1] Olomola AS and Nwafor M (2018) Nigeria Agriculture Sector Performance Review. Lagos, Nigeria: Nigerian Institute of Social and Economic Research (NISER): International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA).
- [2] Michael, A., Giroh, Y. D., Polycarp, M., & Ashindo, Z. E. (2018). Analysis of rural farm households’ access to formal agricultural credit in Yola south local government area, Adamawa state, Nigeria. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, 66(4), 947–954. https://doi.org/10.11118/actaun201866040947
- [3] Adetimehin OD, Okunlola JO and Owolabi KE (2018) Utilization of agricultural information and knowledge for improved production by rice farmers in Ondo State, Nigeria. Journal of Rural Social Sciences 33(1): 76.
- [4] Kazeem, A. A., Dare, A., Olalekan, O., Abiodun, S. E., & Komolafe, T. L. (2017). Attitudes of farmers to extension trainings in Nigeria: Implications for adoption of improved agricultural technologies in Ogun state southwest region. Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 62(4), 423–443. https://doi.org/10.2298/JAS1704423K
- [5] Clark LF and Hobbs JE (2018) Informational barriers, quality assurance and the scaling up of complementary food supply chains in Sub-Saharan Africa. Outlook on Agriculture 47(1): 11–18.
- [6] Idowu EO, Ayanwale AB, Rabirou K, et al. (2012) Effect of rural transportation system on agricultural productivity in Oyo State, Nigeria. Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development in the Tropics and Subtropics 113(1): 13.
From the evidence overview What is holding back Nigerian agriculture and farm technology adoption? Evidence from extension workers and farmer surveys, which cites only works that appear in the studies’ own reference lists. This is a selection, not the full reference list of Strang et al. (2020).
Related research
Related publications on agriculture, food security and farm information systems
Extension workers from three local government areas of Adamawa State confirmed themes from the literature and added new ones, showing that rural farmers face significant problems with government support in six areas: farm input quality and dissemination, fair input subsidization, training, market facilitation, corruption and insecurity.
Extension workers representing about 900 rural farmers in Northeast Nigeria identified six core failures of government support, among them input quality and dissemination, fair subsidization, training, market facilitation and corruption.
In a survey of 105 farm owners, managers and labourers on the Jos Plateau, only marital status, gender and language correlated with FMIS e-adoption; age, education, land size and software experience did not, and a discriminant model using the three significant factors was statistically significant (p = .014).
A critical review of 2015–2020 empirical studies identifies lack of modern-method training, corrupt input dissemination, poor infrastructure, terrorism-driven insecurity, lack of credit and weak strategic planning as the key problems, and finds only weak evidence of significant information-system use in agriculture.
Structural equation modelling of 97 Jos Plateau farm owners, managers and labourers showed that confirmation experience significantly drove satisfaction (path = 0.524) and perceived usefulness (path = 0.383), yet no factor significantly predicted continuance intention, which was uniformly very high.