Journal article · 2019
Factors impacting farm management decision making software adoption
International Journal of Sustainable Agricultural Management and Informatics, 5(1), pp. 1–14 · Published
Summary
What question does this paper answer?
Which factors — confirmation experience, perceived usefulness and satisfaction — explain whether Nigerian farmers intend to continue using agricultural information system (AIS) software for farm management and crop planning?
What did the study find?
Using structural equation modeling on 97 valid survey responses from farm owners, managers and labourers on the Jos Plateau, Nigeria, the study found that confirmation experience significantly influenced satisfaction (path = 0.524, p < .001) and perceived usefulness (path = 0.383, p < .001). No factor significantly influenced continuance intention, even though farmers reported a very high intention to keep using AIS (median 5, mean 4.49 on a 1–5 scale).
Why does it matter?
The results raise controversial issues about the AIS education given to Nigerian farmers and the effectiveness of government agriculture technology funding. The authors suggest policy makers provide more educational seminars on alternative AIS products, including local vendor demonstrations, and recommend replication in other developing countries in Western Africa and elsewhere.
This study is part of the evidence overview What is holding back Nigerian agriculture and farm technology adoption? Evidence from extension workers and farmer surveys
Key findings
- The study analyzed 97 valid survey responses from farm owners, managers and labourers in Jos Plateau State, Nigeria, most of whom (over 81%) had more than one year of experience using agricultural information systems.
- All four constructs in the expectation confirmation model were reliable, with Cronbach alpha of 0.703 for perceived usefulness, 0.909 for satisfaction, 0.773 for confirmation and 0.955 for continuance intention.
- The structural equation model of Nigerian farmers' AIS use showed acceptable fit (CFI = 0.959, GFI = 0.891, AGFI = 0.816, RMSEA = 0.083, RMSR = 0.041, NFI = 0.905).
- Confirmation experience was the strongest factor in the Nigerian farm software model, significantly influencing satisfaction (path coefficient = +0.524, p = .001) and perceived usefulness (+0.383, p < .001).
- Only two of five hypotheses were supported: satisfaction did not significantly influence continuance intention (+0.132, p = .203), and perceived usefulness did not significantly influence satisfaction (+0.320, p = .106) or continuance intention (+0.230, p = .886).
- Despite no significant predictors, Nigerian farmers reported very high intention to continue using AIS (median 5, mean 4.49, SD 0.82 on a 1–5 scale), higher than their satisfaction (mean 4.21) or confirmed experience (mean 4.43).
- The authors suggest high power distance in Nigerian national culture, lack of awareness of alternative AIS software, or AIS being more effective than manual methods may explain why farmers intend to keep using AIS regardless of satisfaction.
Source: Strang et al. (2019), International Journal of Sustainable Agricultural Management and Informatics, 5(1), pp. 1–14. DOI: 10.1504/IJSAMI.2019.10019819
Study at a glance
| Research question | Do confirmation experience, perceived usefulness and satisfaction predict Nigerian farmers' intention to continue using agricultural information systems? |
|---|---|
| Design | Quantitative, positivist survey based on expectation confirmation theory, piloted in Yola, Nigeria, and offered in English, Hausa or Berom |
| Sample | 105 farm owners, farm managers and labourers on farms of 0.5–40 hectares in Jos Plateau State, Nigeria (March 2018), selected by stratified random sampling; 97 valid responses |
| Methods | Cronbach alpha, confirmatory factor analysis (maximum likelihood) and structural equation modeling path analysis |
| Main result | Only H2 (confirmation → satisfaction, 0.524) and H5 (confirmation → perceived usefulness, 0.383) were supported; no factor significantly predicted continuance intention |
| Implication | Government technology funding and farmer education about alternative AIS products should be reconsidered |
| Citation | Strang et al. (2019) · DOI 10.1504/IJSAMI.2019.10019819 |
Abstract
In this study, we use an unconventional socio-cultural ideology to examine if Western African farmers think agricultural information systems (AISs) improve economic production, at the individual level of analysis. Food production is a necessity for our survival but it has been negatively impacted by unstable financial markets, climate change, political upheavals and health pandemics, especially in Western African-based developing countries. We developed a four factor model based on the information systems expectancy confirmation theory which could determine why Nigerian farmers adopt agricultural information systems. We used a survey to collect data from farmers, we validated the questions using a pilot study, and we developed a structural equation model to quantitatively explain why farmers make the decision to adopt or discontinue the use of AIS electronic software. We found that farmer’s satisfaction was positively influenced by high confirmation experience with AIS. To a lesser extent we found that farmer’s satisfaction was positively impacted by AIS perceived usefulness (PU). Interestingly, we found no evidence that any factor was related to farmer’s behavioural intent for continued use of AIS. The results raise controversial issues concerning AIS effectiveness and government technology funding in Western African countries.
Abstract as published in International Journal of Sustainable Agricultural Management and Informatics.
Keywords: agricultural information system; AIS; farm management; crop planning; decision making software; adoption; perceived use; continuance intention; satisfaction; confirmation experience; expectancy confirmation theory; Western Africa; Nigeria
Key terms
- Agricultural information system (AIS)
- A system in which agricultural information is generated, transformed, transferred, consolidated, received and fed back so that these processes function synergistically to underpin knowledge utilisation by agricultural producers (Röling, 1988); in this study it includes farm management information systems.
- Expectation confirmation theory (ECT)
- A theory explaining how continued use of information technology is sustained, linking confirmation of expectations, perceived usefulness and satisfaction to continuance intention.
- Continuance intention
- A user's intention to continue using an existing system rather than discontinue it.
Limitations
- The sample is small, so the authors recommend the study be replicated, especially given the controversial findings.
- The RMSEA (0.083) was slightly above the desired 0.08, and the continuance intention factor did not meet the AVE benchmark.
How to cite
Strang, K. D., Bitrus, S. N., & Vajjhala, N. R. (2019). Factors impacting farm management decision making software adoption. International Journal of Sustainable Agricultural Management and Informatics, 5(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSAMI.2019.10019819
BibTeX
@article{strang2019nigerian,
title = {Factors impacting farm management decision making software adoption},
author = {Strang, Kenneth David and Bitrus, Sarah Nankyer and Vajjhala, Narasimha Rao},
journal = {International Journal of Sustainable Agricultural Management and Informatics},
volume = {5},
number = {1},
pages = {1--14},
year = {2019},
publisher = {Inderscience},
doi = {10.1504/IJSAMI.2019.10019819},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSAMI.2019.10019819}
}Related research